AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Sigma 35mm 1.4 canon8/5/2023 ![]() I also used this on my Canon 80D and the footage looked outstanding given the 1.6 crop factor (which turned it into a 56mm lens). So for any other videographers looking to compliment their arsenal and considering the Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art series for video, this is an awesome lens. At a close up range the autofocus worked well. Something to keep in mind if you are using autofocus.īut given the wider angle of the 35mm (compared to my 50mm) I had to get closer to my subject anyway. However I noticed that it did a lot of hunting. Shooting wide open with F-Stop set on 1.4, just melted the background into creamy bokeh’s. Its a bit heavier than I expected but after some effort I was able to balance this lens and my Canon 5D Mark IV on a Ronin-S gimbal (which handled the weight effortlessly). Up until now I have been using my staple Canon 50mm 1.8 STM lens for just about all of my video projects. The first addition to the Art category in Sigma’s Global Vision, the 35mm 1.4 DG HSM includes new features based around a unique lens concept and design. I primarily indulge in Videography and Cinematography. 35mm F1.4 DG HSM A Our True Flagship The Sigma 35mm 1.4 DG HSM is a state of the art lens designed for full frame cameras but can also be used with APS-C sensors as well. ![]() ![]() The crispy stills were complimentary from my photographer partner’s camera (Nikon D810). An optically advanced wide-angle prime, the Canon EF sigma 35mm f1.4 DG HSM Art Lens from Sigma mixes a comfortable focal length with an especially fast. In my tests with a pre-production sample, the bokeh in blurred areas was not only a step-up from the original DSLR version, but up there with models costing a lot more. The above behind the scenes video was captured using the Sigma 35mm 1.4 on a Canon 5d Mark IV. The Sigma 35mm f1.4 DG DN Art is a quality wide-angle lens for mirrorless cameras that’s capable of attractive rendering and sharp results. The Canon’s bokeh is not the smoothest when focusing on distant subjects, but in a 12x12 room the bokeh should look fine, if not as shallow as the Sigma.After almost two years I finally managed to purchase a Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art lens for Canon. If you only shoot from a tripod, this is a non-issue.Īnother another thought: both lenses can focus closely, but the Canon has 1/2 macro, which can be useful if you want to try shooting, say, body parts closeups. Digital IS does help with unstabilized lenses like the Sigma, but not to the extent of a true optical IS. One thought: If you’re going to keep the 90D, then the Sigma is an obvious winner because it works on both it and the RP.Īnother thought: the Canon will make it much easier to do handheld video on the RP, which lacks IBIS. Thanks so much and look forward to a response! Which is best for my use case? I'm taking indoor portraits in a 12x12 room and have limited space for the next year or so. I however know this is hard to achieve for a 35mm but it seems like it's down to these two lenses in the price range. This is what I'm trying to achieve in my photography and some video on a tripod, something with clean images and smooth/strong bokeh. I know the Sigma has autofocusing issues, and some lens distortion - but I noticed the bokeh being a bit better at 1.4/vs 1.8 (for obvious reasons with the stop being a bit lower). I've read and watched a few reviews of both and it's a hard decision for me as this is another big purchase. I also have the Sigma 50mm 1. I really loved my 90D, but I realized I think I like the full frame and "prefer" it a bit more. Theres nothing shiny inside the barrel of the adapter and nothing that should be causing that from any physical standpoint. I've done a search here but just purchased a Canon EOS RP.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |